When drafting a usage policy it is important to remember this, and decide
what your priority is. If you are using
it for both, then I would argue that simply publishing the policy and getting
staff to indicate that they have read it isn’t enough; it will be treated like
a EULA – agreed to but never read.
Ultimately, every organisation must make their own decisions with respect
to IT policy, so banning staff from using social networking sites, for example,
may be appropriate. Certainly, I have
been with companies in the past who impose a total ban on internet access through
company hardware. However this is
increasingly impractical with the current trend toward BYOD. If you are allowing access to your network
with these devices then usage policies become increasingly important,
particularly if one of those devices happens to have been jailbroken.
This latter point does highlight the ironic fact that often these usage
policies are written and forgotten about, despite the fact that they apply to
the fastest moving technological and social trends.
In security terms, every unauthorised or non-work related interaction
that your employees have on the web is another potential attack vector. Therefore, returning to the beginning, I
believe a good usage policy should be a foundation on which to build effective
user training. The document itself
should be accessible; it should be clearly written, avoiding as much jargon as
possible. Ideally it should have a bullet pointed executive summary which
distills the points you are most keen to establish. However it should be backed up with suitable
training.
Consider this recent
article in the Washington Post: If
your staff fall prey to a mock phishing attack that redirects them to your IT
policy, they’re a lot more likely to remember it.
It stands to reason: If employees
understand why you have a policy in the first place, and the potential problems
in ignoring it, then they will be more likely to follow it. You can inculcate the policy into the culture
of your organisation in this way, hopefully reducing the times you have to
raise the failure to comply with the policy in a disciplinary interview. By then, the damage is already done.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Did you find our blog useful? Let us know! We would love to hear your thoughts, opinions and comments regarding any of our blog posts.