Showing posts with label compliance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label compliance. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

Security B-Sides MSP 2014 - Automating Compliance

Last week, our team flew across the ocean, to Minneapolis to attend and present at Security B-Sides MSP 2014.





Security B-Sides is an information security event, that follows an "unconference" format and was setup by a few renowned security experts, in 2012, after large hacking conferences (BlackHat, DefCon) experienced a huge amount of subscriptions to their CfP (Call for Papers) and simply ran out of space to accommodate them all. 






Our team came to discuss Automating Compliance. Titania's founder, Ian Whiting, spoke about his background as a penetration tester, the concept behind creating the network security auditing and compliance tools, Nipper Studio and Paws Studio and why he thinks it is essential that software "should just work". 


My background is a penetration tester. I used to be one of those geeks, hackers that would sit in the corner of the room, and got the blame for everything that went wrong: "it must be the guy coming in doing the auditing that's causing all of these network problems today."

I used to have to run a wide variety of different kind of tools to do those jobs and it's very important to understand exactly what the software is doing, but also to understand the weaknesses of the software.


I was once given a job, many years ago, to audit some network switches and I think it's very important that auditors' time is best spent doing things that require a human to look at, while things that are fairly mundane and routine are excellent candidates for automation. I truly believe that. So I sat down and someone gave me 30 configs for different switches to go through manually. At this point I thought: "now is the time to start automating this kind of process. It's a very mundane task, computers are ideal at automating those very basic checks".

One of the things that being a penetration tester has led me very strongly to believe is that all software should be easy to use. I don't care if it takes the software developer an extra 6 months to code a bit of software. For the users it should be intuitive and easy to use. It should be there to help you and it should go hand in hand with the way you work, in order to reduce the amount of time that it takes you to audit. It should just work. I don't want a bit of software that I install on a system and then have to tweak  for the next half an hour, using Google to try and work out what's going wrong and fix it along the way. It's one of the founding principles of the software that we develop. 



We have a product called Nipper Studio which automates the auditing of firewalls, routers, switches and your various network infrastructure devices and another called Paws Studio, which does similar things for servers and workstations. Both products offer free evaluations, so that you can give it a go on your own platform. One of the things I think it's very important, is to be able to try these things for yourself. You shouldn't have to go and buy something blind, in the hope that what the sales person told you about the product is true and that it's going to do what they said it'd do. You have to try things out for yourself and that's why we provide evaluations for our software. 

Download your free evaluation license here. 

Although the first edition of the Minnesota chapter, the event was appreciated by the industry and praised by the media. 








Aside from numerous talks from cyber security experts (an overview of the talks can be found in this previous post), the keynote opening speech was delivered by a legend in the Chinese cyber warfare arena: Lt. Col. (ret) William Hagestad (@RedDragon1949). A very worthwhile talk to listen to and the Colonel is a very engaging presence on the scene. The talk can be found here and it is number 2 on the list, right after the Opening Ceremonies from Matthew J. Harmon, Bradley Ammerman and Tom O'Neill. You can also read the story in CSO Online: Why our lack of understanding on China may be the biggest risk 

An overview of all the talks can be found in our previous post, or viewed / downloaded
off the Security B-Sides wiki.



Video and images courtesy of @mjharmon

Friday, 22 August 2014

Titania Presenting At Security B-Sides MSP – Minnesota Chapter of Security B-Sides

Come And See Us At The Nerdery

Titania’s MD, Ian Whiting, and COO, Nicola Whiting are traveling to Minnesota this week to discuss compliance and security with infosec experts at Security B-Sides MSP, hosted at the Nerdery, Minnesota. 


'Workstation Configuration Hardening' talk 
As sponsors and supporters of the B-Sides series, we are contributing a 1h long presentation appropriately called “Workstation Configuration Hardening” featuring our compliance solution – Paws Studio. The talk will take place in the Crypto Party room, from 13.00 – 14.00. In this presentation, Ian Whiting will be discussing configuration management, how compliance fits in with organizational needs, the issue of compliance vs. security and the need for automated solutions, while finishing with an interactive demonstration of Paws Studio. To take part in the demo you only need to bring a device (laptop, tablet) and install Paws Studio on the machine. You also have the option to get an evaluation key to try it later at home, or check out other policies supported. 

You can also come and listen to Ian's talk on “Automating Compliance” which will take place in the Auditorium, from 12:15, followed by Josh Paul, from Dakota State University and Mike Lutgen, from Palo Alto Networks. 


BSides happened for all the ‘great talks that never got heard’

The “mother” organization for BSides MSP is Security BSides and it has since its beginnings spawned a multitude of chapters all over the world B’Sides started in 2009 when Mike Dahn (@MikD), Jack Daniel (@jack_daniel), Chris Nickerson (@isc4thepeople) decided to hold their own conferences ‘on the side’, as the CFP (Call For Papers) at BlackHat or DEF CON was oversubscribed. In its non-conformist style, the event defines itself through a negation: B-Sides is not the All-Conference-Rejects, while adamant that it is not a conference looking to discuss the current big thing. B-Sides is on the lookout for the people who are discussing the NEXT BIG THING. 

The event has a different structure to other established conferences in the industry. The Structured chapters follow a more “official” conference format and are usually run alongside other security conferences (Black Hat, RSA etc.). The other style, which is also what you can expect at the Minnesota chapter, is the Unconference format; it is meant to be relaxed, interactive and the general idea is to take part in the conversation, ask questions and “make it as good as you want it to be”.


What Else Is On?

BSides MSP schedule


There are plenty of exciting keynotes, presentations and competitions to choose from including a Crypto Party, a Capture The Flag competition as well as other initiatives.

The keynote program includes well-known names in the infosec and was determined by community vote:

Opening the keynote track is Lt. Col. William Hagestad II  (@RedDragon1949)  is a renowned expert in Chinese cyber warfare who will be giving an overview of the 'Chinese Use of Computers & Networks as a Strategic Weapon'.

Mike Saunders (@hardwaterhacker) talks about 'Problems with Parameters' - After networks and servers become more secure, the soft belly of the Internet consists of vulnerabilities in Web Applications.

Leonard Jacobs from Netsecuris (@Netsecuris) opens the conversation on 'Using Your Brain To Beat The Hackers' – automated threat monitoring and threat-detection software are not enough to determine whether a threat is real. The human brain is needed.

Dr. Jared DeMott (@JaredDeMott) talk on 'Appsec: Overview, Deep Dive & Trends' will look at the 3 pillars of Application Security: static, dynamic and manual analysis, popular bugs in code auditing, and file fuzzing and network fuzzing.

Paul Dokas (@pauldokas) presents on 'World Class Network Defense', or 'How I Learned To Ignore Vendors And Use Tools That Work' brings a non-commercial perspective on open source tools to create a defense system for the network.

The ending keynote is held by Rafal Los (@RafalLos) Director Solutions Research at Accuvant who makes a compelling case for 'Succeeding in Security by Measuring Your Failure'. When it comes to breaches, understanding what to measure is just as important as understanding how to measure effectively. Here, in the failures, we can find success.

We are proud to join forces with other industry names in sponsoring the Security B-Sides MSP: The Nerdery (@the_nerdery), ISC2 (@ISC2), Palo Alto Networks (@PaloAltoNtwks) DSU Dakota State (@DakotaState), Milton Security Group (@MiltonSecurity), Bromium(@bromium), Symantec (@SYMCPartners), Netsecuris (@Netsecuris), Global Velocity (@GlobalVelocity), Silent Circle (@SilentCircle), IT Risk Limited (@itriskltd). 

Come on over!
If you are in Minnesota on Saturday, 23rd of August, visit us, talk to us, ask us questions and most important, don’t take our word for it! Try Paws Studio for yourself and tell us what you think. As with all BSides events entry is free, but registration is required. Wheaton’s Law applies. Also, do not socially engineer the staff. 


Wednesday, 11 June 2014

Paws Studio Review

By Jim Halfpenny 

About the Author 


Jim is an experienced IT practitioner with 14 years experience in both academia and industry, working with renowned companies including British Airways, Oracle, BSkyB and Cloudera.

Whether you see compliance as a burden or an aspiration we are frequently mandated to meet a certain set of security requirements around our information assets. One important aspect is being able to demonstrate to yourself and to others that your systems meet the criteria set by your compliance regime. How do you ensure that your systems are compliant with your policies or those mandated by compliance standards? A program of auditing your systems will help you understand the state of your estate.

Titania’s Paws Studio provides a means to audit Windows and Linux systems and provide compliance reports against a defined set of policies. It sets out to provide clear and detailed reports of the system’s level of compliance. Policy templates are editable and Paws Studio comes with predefined templates based on established policies and best practice including PCI, SANS and DoD STIG.

Policy templates are essentially a group of compliance audit checks built from the check library provided by Paws Studio. Checks range from high-level tests such as the presence of antimalware software right down to individual file permissions and registry settings.

There are two ways of creating and customising policy templates. The first is a wizard that guides you through creating your policy. Here you can define the rules that comprise your policy by clicking through a series of screen and selecting checks from the library. The interface is straightforward and self-explanatory and it is a great tool for less advanced users. However, the more technically minded user might find it time consuming and prefer to use the supplied Policy Editor instead which is undoubtedly the more powerful tool.

The Policy Editor provides you with a tree layout of your policy, giving you a bird’s eye view on the ability to quickly navigate through the rules.

In addition clicking on the advanced tab gives you a syntax-highlighted view of the raw policy XML. Whatever tool you choose, the result is an XML file defining the compliance checks for your policy and metadata used to generate the final compliance reports.



Once you have your policy defined it’s time to audit your systems. In order to compile a report you need the compliance audit data collected from a machine. At this point you have three options. You can choose to audit the local machine where Paws Studio is installed. You can also audit a system over the network. To do this will need valid administrator credentials on the remote system. Paws Studio will scan the local network for hosts to audit or you can specify the IP address of the machines in scope.





The third option is to use the portable data collector software, a small executable that can be run from a thumb drive. This is particularly useful where you need to audit a system that is not on the network or is air gapped from your audit workstation. Run the Data Collector, choose an audit policy and it will create a .paws file with the audit results.

Once you have collected your audit data you can produce a report on the audited system. Reports contain the result of each test on the system as well as summary charts showing percent tests passed and a breakdown of tests that failed by severity. Paws Studio creates a compliance audit report that can be saved as HTML, PDF, PostScript or Microsoft Word document. CSV and XML formats are also available so you can feed machine-readable reports into other reporting systems or build your own applications to consume your compliance data.



Paws Studio is available for Windows, Mac OS X and various flavours of Linux and currently supports auditing of Windows and Linux systems. This software pitches to the SME market who could be priced out by enterprise-grade auditing software though they are unlikely to benefit from the bells and whistles these tools provide. If you need a cost effective and easy to use compliance reporting tool, Titania’s Paws Studio certainly merits a second look.

Monday, 9 June 2014

Paws Studio Walkthrough

by Alen Damadzic (Software Developer, Titania)

About the Author

Alen is a key member of the technical team and is the lead developer of Paws Studio compliance auditing software. Since joining Titania as a computing graduate three years ago, Alen’s knowledge of software development and cyber security has grown with the company and he now uses this knowledge to support and train new members to the ever growing development team.

Paws Studio is a compliance auditing tool for servers, workstations and other Windows or Linux based systems. At a basic level, creating a compliance report in Paws Studio can be as simple as selecting an audit policy and clicking go. However, behind the scenes, Paws Studio is performing a number of different processes in order to determine what needs to be checked, collecting the data, comparing the collected data against a policy and finally creating a report. This article provides a walkthrough of those processes to enable you to create truly effective and thorough custom policies to audit against.


Figure 1. Paws Studio audit process
A typical Paws Studio audit is a two-step process. The initial step is to collect the data for the audit and the second is to create the report by comparing that data against a compliance list (see Figure 1).

Collecting Audit Data


Data, such as password policy settings, are collected using a data collector. On Windows, the data collector is a small native program that reads the registry, file permissions and so on. The data collector does not require installing on the system that is being audited and does not require anything to be installed. On Linux systems the data collector is a shell script.

The data collector only collects what is required to create the report. Those audit parameters are specified in a policy file, which we will come back to later.

Figure 2. Report creation methods

When you select to create a new report in Paws Studio (see Figure 2), it will give you the option to add all the systems that you want to audit (local and remote). Paws Studio will then deal with executing the data collector for you and retrieve the results. It is important to note that during this process, Paws Studio will tidy up after itself, so no audit files will be left on the audited system.

Figure 3. Manual data collector option
It is also possible for you to run the data collector yourself on various systems and provide Paws Studio with the collected data; this is shown as the “Manual” option (see Figure 3).

To obtain the latest data collector so that you can perform the audit yourself, select the “Export Collector” option from the “Utilities” menu. You will also need a copy of the audit policy file for the data collector. By default on a Windows system the policy files are stored in “C:\Program Files\Paws Studio\XML”. You will find policy files for PCI, STIG, SANS, and others.

The data collector can be executed from the command line on both Windows and Linux systems. This gives you the ability to script the software so you can automate the audit data collection process.

The Audit Policy


Figure 4. Audit policies

When you create a compliance audit report in Paws Studio you have to select an audit policy that you want to check compliance with. It could be a PCI policy, STIG or others. The policy that you check compliance against when producing a Paws Studio report is stored in a specially formatted XML file.

Although Paws Studio is supplied with a number of pre-defined audit policies, you can create your own. You could use your favourite XML editor to create an audit policy file but Paws Studio includes a policy editor.

The audit policy editor has two modes of operation, a wizard mode and editor mode (see Figures 5, 6). The wizard mode is designed to easily enable you to create your own new audit policy, or edit an existing one, and guide you through the process. The editor mode is more suited for advanced users and editing existing policies.

Figure 5. Policy editor: editor mode

Figure 6. Policy editor: wizard mode

Figure 7. Paws Studio Settings

Customizing an Audit Report


Your audit reports can be customized to change the company name, logo, classification and so on. If you want to override the default Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) there is even an option to do that.

Some key customization options such as the “Policy Editor” “Authorized Software” and “Authorized Startup Items” contain the lists of what is determined to be authorized or not during those particular checks.

The “Reporting” options include an “Interactive Mode” setting that will cause Paws Studio to potentially ask you some questions during an audit. For example, some checks may require a physical analysis, such as “is the server room door locked?”.

An Audit Walkthrough

Figure 8. Paws Studio main frame
Now that we have highlighted the key components of a Paws Studio audit, the simple process of performing a report with all the available options is straight forward.

Select the “Create Report” option (see Figure 8).

Figure 9. Report creation methods

Select what you want to audit (see Figure 9).

“Local” will enable you to perform an audit of your local machine.

“Network” will enable to audit other computers on the network. You many need to specify a username and password.

“Manual” will allow you to add manually collected audit data.

Figure 10. Audit policies

Select the audit policy report that you are interested in. You can select multiple audit policies or specify your own using the “Import Policy” button (see Figure 10).

Click on “Create Report”.

Then you can read your report and save it out to a number of different formats such as HTML, Word, PDF, CSV and others.

Conclusion


This article has delved into what goes on behind the scenes of Paws Studio. By walking you through the key processes involved in creating your own compliance reports, it will enable you to get the most out of the software.

Wednesday, 14 May 2014

Paws Studio 2.3.1 Released

Below you can find a couple of new features included in the most recent maintenance release of Paws Studio, Titania’s compliance auditing software. The additions to this new version 2.3.1 are designed to help make the compliance auditing process even quicker and easier. 



Here at Titania we know about penetration testing. We know the job has its upsides - the appeal for trespassing "forbidden" grounds, the methodical research of known vulnerabilities, the hunt for a new weakness and the ultimate achievement of coming up with the patch for it. However, we also know there are less exciting sides. Compliance auditing and reporting is not among top preferences for information security professionals and that's why Paws Studio does all the routine checks against the most used compliance policies, as well as allowing for a personalised audit check-list. 

We've now added a interactive "Submit a Query" option. Just go the ‘Help’ tab at the top of the screen, select ‘Submit a Query’ and follow the wizard. Select ‘finish’ and your question will be sent off to our support team who will get back to you as soon as possible. This speeds up the process as it allows the user the send the query without leaving the system at all. 

Also, to give you the right support, our team  require license information such as product details: type, version and serial no. as well as machine details: platform, memory etc. Previously users would have to locate this information and structure it into an email along with their support query. Now with "Submit a Query" this information can be identified and supplied instantly, with no further user input. 



Another addition is Automated Updates.  Previously, users could check for updates to the software by going to the ‘Tools’ tab at the top of the screen and selecting ‘Update Check’. This would tell you if there was a new version of the software. You could then go and download this from the website. Now, like Nipper Studio, this function is automated in Paws Studio so you can make sure you’re up to date, with just the click of a button.



Small details make the difference when it comes to time. These new features will speed up compliance auditing even more.

Friday, 2 May 2014

Guide to the UK government cyber essentials scheme

First published in HelpNet magazine:

By Edwin Bentley (Senior Software Developer, Titania)
 
About the Author

Edwin joined Titania in 2011 and has since become a key member of development team, having primary involvement in advancement of both the Nipper Studio and Paws Studio software. He has a keen interest in Information Security and the role that the industry will play in the future advancement of technologies.

The results of the latest cyber threat reports and surveys have denominated 2013 as the year of major breaches. The media naturally focuses on the big stories of massive data breaches or coordinated state attacks which leave in their wake a trail of lawsuits, customer data losses and political conflicts. However that’s not the entire spectrum of the cyber security landscape, nor does it reflect the full damage of attacks in cyber space. The SME landscape has its own perils and it suffers just as much as the large corporate domain. The difference is you don’t often hear about it.

Security and compliance is a sore subject for most small and medium sized enterprises. PCI-DSS for example can be a long and painful process for small retailers that are left feeling understandably frustrated at the end of an 80 page document heavy with technical jargon. The next challenge to look forward to is the abundance of guidance and industry bodies, but with no single place to check against a simple number of guidelines. 

Currently the UK cyber security environment is not regulated by compulsory compliance policies. While industry specific frameworks are in place – PCI-DSS for retail, STIG for military, NERC for energy – no clear guidance exists for ensuring organizations operate in a cyber-safe manner for their benefit as well as for the benefit of their customers.

The Cyber Essential Scheme, the new best-practice guidance emitted by the UK government in response to industry demands of a better cyber security policy for the business landscape, was released on the 7th of April 2014. The project follows a call for evidence which concludes that cyber security standards should be internationally recognized, promote international trade, allow systems to exchange and use information efficiently and be auditable.

5 points of the cyber essentials scheme:

1. Boundary firewalls and internet gateways

The objective is to restrict unauthorized access from the internet by configuring firewall rules, internet gateways or other network devices.

What to look for?

Default admin passwords, firewall rules, blocking of vulnerable services (like NetBIOS, SMB, tftp, RPC etc), updates for firewall rules and restricted access to the admin interface for the boundary firewall should assist with securing inbound and outbound network traffic. 

Case in point

The Target breach was achieved through a third-party vendor. Limited access was not enabled on the POS network; hence the attackers gained access to the contractor’s credentials, which managed environmental controls remotely, and from there it was only a matter of time until the hackers infiltrated the payment processing systems across the entire network.

2. Secure configuration

Is default-mode safe-mode? Whether it’s a computer, a network, or a phone the “out-of-the-box” mode is never safe, which is why stronger authentication is required.

What to look for?

Removing unnecessary user accounts – especially any with special access privileges - and pre-installed unnecessary software, changing default passwords, disabling the auto-run feature to prevent code being executed without user knowledge and consent and installing a personal firewall. 

Case in point

When the Winter Olympics were taking place in Sochi, the NBC News’ ran a story on how the reporter’s phone and test computers were hijacked ‘before we even finished our coffee’. Later, the story was proved a hoax, as a combination of risky user behaviour (clicking unknown links, visiting suspicious websites) and default security settings left intentionally on the two test laptops.

3. User access control

User accounts with special access should be assigned only to authorised individuals and granted with only minimum level of access to applications, computers and networks. User privilege is essential to manage, in order to avoid abuse. Privilege abuse makes up for 88% of insider threat actions, according to the latest Verizon DBIR (Data Breaches Investigation Report).

What to look for?

Accounts should be subject to approval, restrict access to a need-to-know basis, details of special access clearance should be documented and reviewed, for a clean track record and auditing procedures. Admin accounts should be used only for administrative tasks and isolated from internet or email. Authentication should require a unique username and a strong password which should be changed on a regular basis. Updated removal or disabling of special privilege accounts when necessary. 

Case in point

Last year’s most prominent case of user privilege abuse was the U.S. government contractor Edward Snowden. With unauthorized SSH keys and falsified digital certificates, Snowden managed to access and steal NSA documents without setting off the alarms across the network, and the NSA is not an isolated case. These type of practices have already been reported in the wild. Under the context of trust abuse and special access threats, every enterprise is a sitting target. 

4. Malware protection

Viruses, worms, spyware can infect any device with an internet connection, thus any organization should have malware protection software. 

What to look for?

Malware protection software should be configured to scan files automatically upon access (downloading, opening files, or accessing web pages) as well as regular automatic scans. Regular updates should be installed, either through manual or centralized configuration. Website blacklisting should be employed to prevent suspicious connections. 

Case in point

The Google Drive scam was a very convincing phishing scam targeting Google Docs and Google Drive users. It consisted of a simple email with a request to view a shared document on Google Drive. The link led to a fake Google login page, which looked almost identical to a real one, because the fake page was hosted on Google’s servers and benefited from Google’s SSL certification, to make it look even more convincing. But once the user entered their credentials, a PHP script stored them on a compromised server. 

With a configured list of blacklisted websites and up to date detection software, this type of scam would not pose much a problem to an organization. 

5. Patch management

Any software is prone to technical vulnerabilities. Once discovered and shared publicly theses vulnerabilities are quickly exploited by cyber criminals, or organized groups. 

What to look for?

Ensuring that the software is licensed and supported in order to receive continuous updates. Updates and security patches should be installed in a timely manner. Software which is no longer supported should be removed from the computer or network. 

Case in point

The end of support for Windows XP announced as early as 2007 still came as an unpleasant surprise to dedicated users and cost-weary businesses. But loyal home-users and organizations will have to make the migration very soon, as security threats loom over the unprotected OS when the next patches are released for the other versions of Windows. 

A lifeline to SMEs

The butterfly effect in the cyber market can be even less than a delicate wing batting in Brazil; it can be a weak admin password to a third party vendor with peripheral access to a SCADA system powering the energy grid for a middle-sized country.

International affairs think-tank Atlantic Council in association with Zurich Insurance Group released recently a report which warns of parallels between the global cyber scene and the financial meltdown from 2008. It argues that ‘on the internet, it has been easier to attack than to defend’ because the internet was founded on trust, not security. However, as the internet became increasingly complex, highly interconnected and widely available the risks escalated rapidly.

Source: security-centre.lancs.ac.uk
The report ends with best practice recommendations resonating with the ones found in the Cyber Essentials program. As it stands the UK does not have any cyber security certification, no reference point to measure against and no single agreed guidance to look up to. The Cyber Scheme initiative is the first step to a one-for-all policy, with the only hope that it will not turn to represent yet another compliance headache for SMEs, but an actual support line for the business sector.

CREST, working with CESG the information security branch of GCHQ has developed an assessment framework which is now available for consultation. The full scheme along with the assessment framework and the accreditation badge will be available in summer 2014.

Monday, 28 April 2014

EU Cyber Directive – Guide for SMEs

Source: wikipedia.com
The new EU cyber directive (officially known as NIS –Network & Information Security) is putting compliance issues at the front of concerns for the information security industry, if the keynote speeches at Infosec Europe are anything to go by. Also more industry-specific seminars have been organised, seeking the help of cyber security experts and information security consultants, in order to understand  how these new reforms and legislation will affect them.

Naturally, SMEs are less excited at the prospect of an extra layer of compliance on top of their administrative regulations. Perhaps worse than the extra layer of mandatory compliance is the extra layer of confusion surrounding the directive. As the penalties announced will hit the budgets of recovering businesses hard, it is only natural that the small and medium business sector will want to understand and adjust to the incoming law. Here is a look at a few key aspects of the legislation that will hopefully shed some light on the issue:

1. Cyber security strategy plan
The UK government gave us a head start with the Cyber Essentials Scheme which, devised to offer best practice guidance, actually does what it says on the tin; by providing help to businesses in a non-intrusive manner. It is also a good anticipative practice to prepare organisations for the more incisive Cyber Directive.

2. The government body
The ICO (Information Commissioners Office) already announced it does not want the extra strain on the budget and no other national authority has come forth to take the responsibility of collecting information from SMEs and reporting back to ENISA. Until the issue gets further clarification, it is only a matter of waiting.

3. Introducing the DPO (Data Protection Officer)
It wasn't long ago that the CISO became a role in business, and it got a fairly begrudging welcome, as some CIO's perceived this new role as a threat to their responsibilities. Now the Cyber Directive will introduce the rise of the DPO – Data Protection Officer, rumoured to have an arching role over both the CIO and CISO in an organisation. The DPO will also take on the less desirable role of the “no” guy within the organisation when any innovative process involving data will be stifled under the “cyber directive” framework.

4. Auditing does not have to be painful
Although audits should happen at least once a year, lack of enforcement and high costs mean that organisations view it about as expectantly as a visit to the dentist. It doesn’t have to be painful though.  If you can’t find anyone who simply loves trawling through compliance policies, keeping up with updates and de-cluttering industry-specific standards, then you could use a compliance auditing tool such as Paws Studio for regular monitoring and a trustworthy penetration tester to check your security twice a year.

5. Better cooperation between management & IT
The relationship between management and IT does need to improve, otherwise (as breach examples happen time and time again) the business and – most importantly – the customers end up suffering.

6. The CERT team
Although it sounds more or less like having a SWAT team hanging around in the IT department, the Computer Emergency Response Team refers to one or more people assigned as the first point of contact when something goes wrong and putting together a mitigating plan. As far as security and compliance policies go, this is a fairly sensible measure. It’s the type of measures that can bring about some sense of control and reactiveness amid the havoc and distress of a cyber-incident.

Source: wired.com
What’s an SME to do?
Unfortunately it does not look as if the law will be bringing in savings of billions to the ones that need it most, though it may bring a better security education and increased awareness. However at least for the time being we must wait and see what the European Parliamentary elections (22 – 25 May 2014) bring forth, and to see if the proposed legislation survives the dissolution of the current Parliament.